CLINICAL RESEARCH
Therapeutic role of low-volume plasma exchange in modulating lipopolysaccharides-binding protein and inflammatory pathways in metabolic syndrome
More details
Hide details
1
Institute for Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation and Rheumatology “Dr Simo Milosevic”, Montenegro
2
Clinical Center of Montenegro, Montenegro
Submission date: 2025-06-24
Final revision date: 2025-12-26
Acceptance date: 2026-01-08
Publication date: 2026-01-23
Corresponding author
Vjeroslava Slavic
Institute for Physical
Medicine, Rehabilitation
and Rheumatology
“Dr Simo Milosevic”
Montenegro
Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis 2026;11(1):17-23
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Metabolic syndrome (MetSy) is associated with chronic low-grade inflammation and metabolic dysfunction, contributing to increased cardiometabolic risk. Low-volume plasma exchange (LVPE) is an emerging extracorporeal therapy designed to reduce systemic inflammation by removing circulating pro-inflammatory mediators. This study evaluated the effects of LVPE on metabolic endotoxemia, inflammation, and mineral metabolism in individuals with MetSy.
Material and methods:
A total of 48 adults with MetSy were enrolled, including 33 men and 15 women, with an average age of 50 years (men: 51 years; women: 48 years). All participants met established diagnostic criteria for MetSy. Each underwent four LVPE cycles using nanoporous membranes designed to selectively remove pro-inflammatory mediators while preserving essential plasma components. Biomarkers of systemic inflammation (CRP, hsCRP), endotoxemia (LBP, zonulin), and mineral metabolism (zinc, magnesium, iron) were measured before and after treatment.
Results:
LVPE significantly reduced CRP levels (p < 0.020), demonstrating attenuation of systemic inflammation. A downward trend in hsCRP was observed (p < 0.050), though without reaching statistical significance. LVPE did not significantly affect endotoxemia markers (LBP, zonulin) or IL-6 (all p > 0.05). A significant post-treatment increase in zinc levels was detected (p < 0.009), while magnesium and iron remained unchanged (p > 0.05). A significant correlation between LBP and CRP after treatment (p < 0.027) suggests that LVPE may modulate systemic inflammation through immune regulatory pathways rather than by directly influencing endotoxemia.
Conclusions:
Four cycles of LVPE effectively reduced low-grade inflammation, as indicated by decreased CRP levels, supporting its potential role as a therapeutic approach in managing inflammation in MetSy. Its effects on endotoxemia and gut permeability remain inconclusive, underscoring the need for additional research to clarify long-term and mechanistic outcomes.
REFERENCES (32)
1.
Kassi E, Pervanidou P, Kaltsas G, Chrousos G. Metabolic syndrome: definition and controversies. BMC Med 2011; 9: 48.
2.
Weiss TW, Arnesen H, Seljeflot I. Components of the interleukin-6 trans-signalling system are associated with the metabolic syndrome, endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffness. Meatbolism 2013; 62: 1008-13.
3.
Indulekha K, Surendar J, Mohan V. High sensitive C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor alpha, inteleukin-6 and vascular cell adhesion molecul-1 levels in Asian Indians with metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance (CURE.I05). J Diabetes Sci Technol 2011; 5: 982-8.
4.
Rexrode KM, Pradhan A, Manson JE, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Relationship of total and abdominal adiposity with CRP and IL-6 in women. Ann Epidemiol 2003; 13: 674-82.
5.
Fuentes E, Fuentes F, Vilahur G, Badimon L, Palomo I. Mechanisms of chronic state of inflammation as mediators that link obese adipose tissue and metabolic syndrome. Mediators Inflamm 2013; 2013: 136584.
6.
Wells JM, Brummer RJ, Derrien M, et al. Homeostasis of gut barrier and potential biomarkers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2017; 312: G171-93.
7.
Neves AL, Coelho J, Couto L, Leite-Moreira A, Roncon-Albuquerque R Jr. Metabolic endotoxemia: a molecular link between obesity and cardiovascular risk. J Mol Endocrinol 2013; 51: R51-64.
8.
Siebler J, Galle PR, Weber MM. The gut-liver-axis: endotoxemia, inflammation, insulin resistance and NASH. J Hepatol 2008; 48: 1032-34.
9.
Boutagy NE, McMillan RP, Frisard MI, Hulver MW. Metabolic endotoxemia with obesity: it is real and relevant? Biochime 2016; 124: 11-20.
10.
Gonzales-Quintela A, Alonso M, Campos J, Vizcaino L, Loidi L, Gude F. Determinants of serum concentration of lipopolysaccharide.binding protein (LBP) in the adult population: the role of obesity. PloS One 2013; 8: e54600.
11.
Gomes JMG, Costa JA, Alfenas RCG. Metabolic endotoxemia and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Metabolism 2016; 68: 133-44.
12.
Ruiz AG, Casafont F, Crespo J, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein plasma levels and liver TNF-alpha gene expression in obese patients: evidence for potential role of endotoxin in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Obes Surg 2007; 17: 1347-80.
13.
Schumann RR. Olde and new findings on lipopolysaccharde-binding protein: a soluble pattern-recognition molecule. Biochem Soc Trans 2011; 39: 989-93.
14.
Vaure C, Liu YA. A comparative review of toll-like receptor 4 expression and funcionality in different animal species. Front Immunol 2014; 269: 8477-82.
15.
Sun L, Yu Z, Ye X, et al. A marker of endotoxemia is associated with obesity and related metabolic disorders in apparently healthy Chinese. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 1925-32.
16.
Hudgins LC, Parker TS, Levine DM, et al. A single intravenous dose of endotoxine rapidly alters lipoprotein and lipid transfer protein in normal volunteers. J Lipid Res 2003; 44: 1489-98.
17.
Slavic V. Apheresis procedure could prevent sequele of HSV1 encephalitis- case report. Ann Antivir Antiretrovir 2020; 4: 10-3.
18.
Alexandrov A, Vassilieva P, Momchilova A, et al. A new approach using nanomembrane-based therapeutic plasmapheresis for tretament of patients with multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitisoptica. Compte Rendus L’academie Bulg Sci 2016; 69: 373-84.
20.
Liu J, Fang Z, Lu Q, Wang Y, Zhang L. Projecting global trends and inequalities in adult overweight and obesity, 2023-2040: findings from the NCD-RisC Database. Obesity 2025; 33: 1955-67.
21.
Blüher M. Obesity: global epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2019; 15: 288-98.
22.
Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Rifai N. C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 836-43.
23.
Devaraj S, Singh U, Jialal I. Human C-reactive protein and the metabolic syndrome. Curr Opin Lipidol 2009; 20: 182-9.
24.
Mohammad S, Thiemermann C. Role of metabolic endotoxemia in systemic inflammation and potential interventions. Front Immunol 2021; 11: 594150.
25.
Elks CM, Francis J. Central adiposity, systemic inflammation, and the metabolic syndrome. Curr Hypertens Rep 2010; 12: 99-104.
26.
Verras GI, Mulita F. Butyrylcholinesterase levels correlate with surgical site infection risk and severity after colorectal surgery: a prospective single-center study. Front Surg 2024; 11: 1379410.
27.
Powell SR. The antioxidant properties of zinc. J Nutr 2000; 130: 1447S-54S.
28.
King JC, Brown KH, Gibson RS, et al. Biomarkers of nutrition for development (BOND)-Zinc review. J Nutr 2016; 146: 858S-85S.
29.
Parrish AR. The impact of aging on epithelial barriers. Tissue Barriers 2017; 5: e1343172.
30.
Fassano A. All disease begins in the (leaky) gut: role of zonulin-mediated gut permeability in the pathogenesis of some chronic inflammatory diseases. F1000Research 2020, 9 (F1000 Faculty Rev): 69.
31.
Shechter M. Magnesium and cardiovascular system. Magnes Res 2010; 23: 60-72.
32.
Pelczynska M, Moszak M, Bogdanski P. The role of magnesium in the pathogenesis of metabolic disorders. Nutrients 2022; 14: 1714.