STATE OF THE ART PAPER
The history of cardiopulmonary bypass and the evolution of pneuma in cardiopulmonary medicine
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Westpfalz Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany
2
School of Social Anthropology, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK
3
Department of Internal Medicine/Pneumonology, Westpfalz Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany
4
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Ippokrateio General Hospital of Athens, Greece
5
Department of Oncology, University General Hospital of Patras, Greece
6
Department of General Surgery, University General Hospital of Patras, Greece
7
Department of General Surgery, General Hospital of Lamia, Greece
8
Department of Surgery, Spital Herisau, Appenzell Ausserrhoden, Switzerland
9
Department of Vascular Surgery, University General Hospital of Patras, Greece
Submission date: 2025-08-10
Final revision date: 2025-09-16
Acceptance date: 2025-10-27
Publication date: 2025-11-20
Corresponding author
Francesk Mulita
Department of
General Surgery
University General
Hospital of Patras
Patras, Greece
Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis 2025;10(1):238-253
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is one of the most groundbreaking medical innovations in history, enabling safe and effective heart surgery by temporarily replacing the function of the heart and lungs. This article begins with ancient concepts of cardiopulmonary function, then traces the evolution of CPB through important physiological and anatomical discoveries, culminating in the development of the modern heart-lung machine. In addition to examining the contributions of significant figures such as Galen, Ibn al-Nafis, William Harvey, and John Gibbon, we also explore the ethical and technical challenges encountered in the early days of open-heart surgery. The historical trajectory of pneuma illustrates the transition from speculative medical theories to empirical science. While no longer relevant in modern physiology, pneuma has left an enduring legacy in medical terminology and holistic perspectives on health, highlighting the deep connections between ancient and contemporary medical thought.
REFERENCES (91)
1.
Konsmo E. The Pauline Metaphors of the Holy Spirit: The Intangible Spirit’s Tangible Presence in the Life of the Christian. Peter Lang, New York 2010.
2.
Frixione E. Pneuma–fire interactions in hippocratic physiology. J Hist Med Allied Sci 2013; 68: 505-28.
3.
von Staden H. Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989.
4.
Tieleman T. Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul: Argument and Refutation in the De Placitis Books II–III. Philosophia Antiqua. Vol. 74. Leiden: Brill; 1996.
5.
Packer M. Lessons for cardiovascular clinical investigators: the tumultuous 2,500-year journey of physicians who ignited our fire. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 84: 78-96.
6.
Aird WC. Discovery of the cardiovascular system: from Galen to William Harvey. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 9 Suppl 1: 118-29.
7.
Wright JP. Psyche and Soma: Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind-Body Problem from Antiquity to Enlightenment. Oxford University Press; Oxford 2000.
8.
Siegel RE. Galen’s System of Physiology and Medicine. S. Karger, Basel 1968.
9.
Zimmermann M. The nervous system in the context of Galen’s physiology. J Hist Neurosci 2001; 10: 1-13.
10.
Rocca J. Galen on the Brain: Anatomical Knowledge and Physiological Speculation in the Second Century AD. Studies in Ancient Medicine. Vol. 26. Leiden: Brill; 2003.
11.
Lloyd G. Pneuma between body and soul. J R Anthropol Inst 2007; 13 (suppl 1): S135-46.
12.
Limet R. D’Hippocrate à Harvey: vingt siècles d’histoire de la circulation [From Hippocrates to Harvey: twenty centuries of research on circulation]. Rev Med Liege 2010; 65: 562-8..
13.
Yoeli-Tlalim R. Tibetan ‘wind’ and ‘wind’ illnesses: towards a multicultural approach to health and illness. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 2010; 41: 318-24.
14.
Manetti G. Air and pneuma: the roots of material and spiritual thought in Greek philosophy. Pneuma Studies J 2011; 10: 95-110.
15.
Santacroce L, Topi S, Haxhirexha K, Hidri S, Charitos IA, Bottalico L. Medicine and healing in the pre-socratic thought – a brief analysis of magic and rationalism in ancient herbal therapy. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets 2021; 21: 282-7.
16.
Barnes J. Anaximenes and the notion of arche in early Greek philosophy. Hist Philos Q 2008; 25: 123-40.
17.
Long A. Air as a vital element in early Greek cosmology. Phronesis 2013; 58: 290-305.
18.
Porter JI. Love, Strife, and the roots of all things: empedoclean cosmology and the presocratic tradition. Representations 2020; 169: 11-29.
19.
Lesher JH. The unity of the four elements in Empedocles’ philosophy. Philosophical Inquiry 2012; 34: 218-34.
20.
Leivaditis V, Maniatopoulos A, Mulita F, et al. Between air and artery: a history of cardiopulmonary bypass and the rise of modern cardiac surgery. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2025; 12: 365.
21.
Bennett MR. The early history of the synapse: from Plato to Sherrington. Brain Res Bull 1999; 50: 95-118.
22.
Kihara Y. The concept of pneuma in ancient Greek thought and its historical evolution. J Philos East Asian Cult Med 2019; 11: 1-10.
23.
Van der Eijk PJ. Hart en hersenen, bloed en pneuma. Hippocrates, Aristoteles en Diocles over de lokalisering van cognitievefuncties [Heart and brains, blood and pneuma. Hippocrates, Aristotle en Diocles on the localization of cognitive functions]. Gewina 1995; 18: 8-23.
24.
Gregoric P, Lewis O, Kuhar M. The substance of de spiritu. Early Sci Med 2015; 20: 101-24.
25.
Hillar M, Prahl F. The problem of the soul in Aristotle’s De anima. In: Contributors to the Philosophy of Humanism. Hillar M, Prahl F (eds.). Humanists of Houston, Houston 1994; 51-82.
26.
Lewis O. Praxagoras of cos on arteries, pulse and pneuma. fragments and interpretation. Stud Anc Med 2017; 48: 1-375.
27.
Paraskevas GK, Koutsouflianiotis KN, Nitsa Z, Demesticha T, Skandalakis P. Knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of the spleen throughout Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Anat Sci Int 2016; 91: 43-55.
28.
Kudlien F. Die Pneuma-Bewegung. Ein Beitraz zum Thema “Medizin und Stoa” [Pneuma movement. A contribution to the theme “Medicine and the Stoa”]. Gesnerus 1974; 31: 86-98.
29.
Rinotas A. Stoicism and alchemy in late antiquity: zosimus and the concept of pneuma. Ambix 2017; 64: 203-19.
30.
Pappas G, Papadopoulos E. The Hippocratic corpus: foundations of modern medical thinking. J Med Philos 2002; 27: 487-500.
31.
Fowler RC. On the heart of the Hippocratic corpus: its meaning, context and purpose. Med Hist 2023; 67: 266-83.
32.
Nutton V. The theory of pneuma in Hippocratic medicine: a holistic understanding of life processes. Med Hist 2011; 55: 285-300.
33.
McVaugh M. Pneuma and physiology in the Hippocratic writings: vitalism and the science of health. J Hist Sci 2010; 48: 621-34.
34.
Allen M. Humoral theory and its relationship to pneuma in ancient medicine. Perspect Biol Med 2015; 58: 72-82.
35.
Rothschild E, Wiesner-Hanks M, editors. The Concept of Health in Early Modern Medicine. Springer, Cham 2020; 19-37.
36.
Crivellato E, Ribatti D. Soul, mind, brain: Greek philosophy and the birth of neuroscience. Brain Res Bull 2007; 71: 327-36.
37.
Lokhorst GJ. De oudstetheoerie over hemisfeerspecialisatie [The oldest theory of hemispheric specialization]. Gewina 1995; 18: 37-50.
38.
Reverón RR. Herophilus and Erasistratus, pioneers of human anatomical dissection. Vesalius 2014; 20: 55-8.
39.
Stefanou MI. The footprints of neuroscience in Alexandria during the 3rd-century BC: Herophilus and Erasistratus. J Med Biogr 2020; 28: 186-94.
40.
Erickson R. Erasistratus and the development of the circulatory system theory. J Hist Med Allied Sci 2004; 59: 1-22.
41.
Wills A, Wills A. Herophilus, Erasistratus, and the birth of neuroscience. Lancet 1999; 354: 1719-20.
42.
Wilson LG. Erasistratus, Galen, and the pneuma. Bull Hist Med 1959; 33: 293-314.
43.
Lloyd G. Herophilus and the study of the nervous system. Lancet Neurol 2001; 12: S23-7.
44.
Walker A. Herophilus and the history of the trachea. J Anatomy 2001; 199: 395-401.
45.
Cunningham D. Dissection and vivisection in Alexandrian medicine: an empirical revolution. J Anat 2008; 213: 623-30.
46.
Wilkins L. The transformation of pneuma in Alexandrian anatomy and physiology. Med Hist 2012; 56: 143-58.
47.
Imai M. Herophilus of Chalcedon and the Hippocratic tradition in early Alexandrian medicine. Hist Sci 2011; 21: 103-22.
48.
Hankinson RJ. Stoicism and Medicine. In: The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Inwood B. (ed.) Cambridge 303.
49.
Long AA, Sedley DN. The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987; 1: 334-5.
50.
Smith CM. Origin and uses of primum non nocere – above all, do no harm! J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 45: 371-7.
51.
Jones P. Galen’s concept of pneuma and the physiology of the brain. J Hist Neurosci 1999; 8: 12-8.
52.
Smith J. Galen’s misunderstanding of the heart and circulation. Med Hist 2004; 48: 235-46.
53.
West JB. Galen and the beginnings of Western physiology. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2014; 307: L121-8.
54.
Pasipoularides A. Galen, father of systematic medicine. An essay on the evolution of modern medicine and cardiology. Int J Cardiol 2014; 172: 47-58.
55.
Seaton A. Breaking with Galen: Servetus, Colombo and the lesser circulation. QJM 2014; 107: 411-3.
56.
Neder JA. Cardiovascular and pulmonary interactions: why Galen’s misconceptions proved clinically useful for 1,300 years. Adv Physiol Educ 2020; 44: 225-31.
57.
Nguyen V. Galen’s impact on medicine and his contributions to physiological theories. Einstein J Biol Med 2019; 29: 12-7.
58.
Harrison, M. Galen and the foundations of medicine. J History Med 2014; 23: 215-26.
59.
Pellegrin P. Galen and the development of medieval medicine. History Sci 1999; 37: 15-31.
60.
Sakr M. Ibn al-Nafis: the first who described the pulmonary blood circulation. J Allied Sci 2020; 3: 21-3.
61.
Hussain SM, Hossain S. The discoverer of pulmonary blood circulation: Ibn Nafis or William Harvey? JIMSA 2015; 28: 199-201.
62.
Tehrani S. Ibn-al-Nafis: an ophthalmologist who first correctly described the circulatory system. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2021; 10: 17.
63.
Bouras-Vallianatos P. Case histories in Late Byzantium: reading the patient in John Zacharias Aktouarios’ on urines. Stud Anc Med 2016; 45: 390-409.
64.
Bennett D. Medical practice and manuscripts in Byzantium. Soc Hist Med 2000; 13: 279-91.
65.
Constantelos DJ. Medicine and social welfare in the Byzantine Empire. Med Secoli 1999; 11: 337-55.
66.
de la Pena PB. Byzantine medical book and the diffusion of Byzantine medicine in the Eastern Mediterranean. Med Secoli 1999; 11: 461-76.
67.
Porteous M, Holden H. William Harvey and the circulation of the blood. Postgrad Med J 2009; 85: 539-43.
68.
Cumming C, Jones G, Cairns M. The work of William Harvey. Clin Cardiol 1985; 8: 214-23.
69.
Kemp S, Wittekind A, McKenzie J, et al. Oxygen and its role in health and disease. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2013; 305: L347-57.
70.
West JB. Joseph Priestley, oxygen, and the enlightenment. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2014; 306: L111-9.
71.
Karamanou M, Tsoucalas G, Androutsos G. Hallmarks in the study of respiratory physiology and the crucial role of Antoine-Laurent de Lavoisier (1743–1794). Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2013; 305: L591-4.
72.
Karamanou M, Androutsos G. Antoine-Laurent de Lavoisier (1743-1794) and the birth of respiratory physiology. Thorax 2013; 68: 978-9.
73.
West JB. The collaboration of Antoine and Marie-Anne Lavoisier and the first measurements of human oxygen consumption. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2013; 305: L775-85.
74.
Moser L. The birth of modern pulmonology: pulmonary circulation and the foundations of respiratory medicine. Respir Med 2006; 100: 15-23.
75.
King J. Pneuma and the transition to evidence-based respiratory science. J Appl Physiol 2011; 110: 682-92.
76.
Weibel ER. The anatomy of gas exchange: the alveolar-capillary membrane and its role in respiratory physiology. Chest 2012; 141: 1263-71.
77.
Hudlicka O. Alveolar function and its adaptive mechanisms in pulmonary physiology. J Clin Invest 2009; 119: 1130-41.
78.
Macklem PT, Cherniack RM. Ventilation-perfusion relationships and their role in pulmonary gas exchange. Physiol Rev 2007; 87: 911-52.
79.
Fischer P. From speculation to science: the evolution of pulmonary medicine. Med Hist 2005; 49: 191-205.
80.
Zhang WB, Jia DX, Li HY, et al. Understanding Qi Running in the Meridians as interstitial fluid flowing via interstitial space of low hydraulic resistance. Chin J Integr Med 2018; 24: 304-7.
81.
Dong J. The relationship between traditional Chinese medicine and modern medicine. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013; 2013: 153148.
82.
Pan SY, Litscher G, Gao SH, et al. Historical perspective of traditional indigenous medical practices: the current renaissance and conservation of herbal resources. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2014; 2014: 525340.
83.
Matos LC, Machado JP, Monteiro FJ, Greten HJ. Understanding traditional Chinese medicine therapeutics: an overview of the basics and clinical applications. Healthcare 2021; 9: 257.
84.
Chiang HC, Chang HH, Huang PY, Hsu M. On the qi deficiency in traditional Chinese medicine. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 53: 317-23.
85.
Ghorbani A, Ghadiri Keyhani M. Ibn al-Nafis and the pulmonary circulation. Heart Views 2014; 15: 144-6.
86.
Loukas M, Lam R, Tubbs RS, Shoja MM, Apaydin N. Ibn al-Nafis (1210-1288): the first description of the pulmonary circulation. Am Surg 2008; 74: 440-2.
87.
Keele KD. William Harvey’s discovery of the circulation of the blood. Br Heart J 1961; 23: 243-7.
88.
Bynum WF. Antoine Lavoisier and the discovery of oxygen. Med Hist 1994; 38: 277-89.
89.
Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977; 196: 129-36.
90.
Cacioppo JT, Berntson GG. Relationship between physiological and psychological processes: a perspective from psychophysiology. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 296-310.
91.
Borrell-Carrió F, Suchman AL, Epstein RM. The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2: 576-82.