SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Efficacy and safety of myosin inhibitors for symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis
More details
Hide details
1
Nuvance Health/Vassar Brothers Medical Center, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
2
Department of Cardiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA
3
Department of Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
4
Department of Internal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center/Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
5
Department of Cardiology, Wayne State University, MI, USA
Submission date: 2025-03-23
Acceptance date: 2025-08-05
Publication date: 2025-10-03
Corresponding author
M. Chadi Alraies
Clinical Associate
Professor of Medicine
Wayne State University
Medical Director of
Cardiac Cath Lab
Detroit Medical Center
Cardiovascular Institute
Heart Hospital
311 Mack Ave
Detroit, MI 48201, USA
Phone: (216) 255-0008
Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis 2025;10(1):228-237
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common genetic cardiac disorder associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Cardiac myosin inhibitors (MIs), including mavacamten and aficamten, offer a novel therapeutic approach for HCM.
Material and methods:
An online database search was performed from inception to September 2024. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared mavacamten with placebo/guideline medical treatment for HCM.
Results:
Six RCTs involving 1,081 participants were analyzed. Cardiac myosin inhibitors significantly reduced left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradients at rest (–70.22 mm Hg, 95% CI: –85.42 to –55.03) and during the Valsalva maneuver (–61.44 mm Hg, 95% CI: –71.10 to –51.78). Patients experienced improved functional status, with a pooled risk ratio (RR) of 2.21 (95% CI: 1.75 to 2.80, p < 0.05) for at least one NYHA class improvement and an enhanced Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) (+7.80 points, 95% CI: 4.58 to 11.02, p < 0.05). Biomarkers, including NT-proBNP (–69.41 pg/ml, 95% CI: –87.06 to –51.75, p < 0.05) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) (–42.66 ng/l, 95% CI: –48.47 to –36.85, p < 0.05), showed significant reductions. Reductions in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were observed, with aficamten demonstrating a greater reduction (–10.35%, 95% CI: –13.48 to –7.21) compared to mavacamten (–2.50%, 95% CI: –6.21 to 1.20). Safety analyses showed no significant increase in treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.14), serious adverse events (SAEs) (RR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.37 to 1.28), or atrial fibrillation (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.27 to 2.23).
Conclusions:
MIs significantly improve symptomatic, functional, and biomarker outcomes in symptomatic HCM while maintaining an acceptable safety profile, highlighting their potential as a transformative treatment option. Further studies are warranted to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety.
REFERENCES (36)
1.
Maron BJ, Rowin EJ, Casey SA, Maron MS. How hypertrophic cardiomyopathy became a contemporary treatable genetic disease with low mortality: shaped by 50 years of clinical research and practice. JAMA Cardiol 2016; 1: 98-105.
2.
Semsarian C, Ingles J, Maron MS, Maron BJ. New perspectives on the prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 65: 1249-54.
3.
Harris SP, Lyons RG, Bezold KL. In the thick of it: HCM-causing mutations in myosin binding proteins of the thick filament. Circ Res 2011; 108: 751-64.
4.
Spudich JA. Three perspectives on the molecular basis of hypercontractility caused by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutations. Pflugers Arch 2019; 471: 701-17.
5.
Maron BJ, Desai MY, Nishimura RA, et al. Diagnosis and evaluation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 79: 372-89.
6.
Maron MS, Hellawell JL, Lucove JC, Farzaneh-Far R, Olivotto I. Occurrence of clinically diagnosed hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the United States. Am J Cardiol 2016; 117: 1651-4.
7.
Ommen SR, Mital S, Burke MA, et al. 2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 76: 3022-55.
8.
Marian AJ. Contemporary treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Texas Heart Instit J 2009; 36: 194-204.
9.
Olivotto I, Oreziak A, Barriales-Villa R, et al. Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2020; 396: 759-69.
10.
Maron MS, Masri A, Choudhury L, et al. Phase 2 study of aficamten in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: REDWOOD-HCM. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 81: 34-45.
11.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n71.
12.
Coats CJ, Masri A, Nassif ME, et al. Dosing and safety profile of aficamten in symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: results from SEQUOIA-HCM. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13: e035993.
13.
Tian Z, Li L, Li X, et al. Effect of mavacamten on chinese patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the EXPLORER-CN randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol 2023; 8: 957-65.
14.
Desai MY, Owens A, Geske JB, et al. Myosin inhibition in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy referred for septal reduction therapy: VALOR-HCM. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 80: 95-108.
15.
Ho CY, Mealiffe ME, Bach RG, et al. Evaluation of mavacamten in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: MAVERICK-HCM. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75: 2649-60.
16.
Heitner SB, Jacoby D, Lester SJ, et al. Mavacamten treatment for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 2019; 170: 741-8.
17.
Kawas RF, Anderson RL, Ingle SRB, Song Y, Sran AS, Rodriguez HM. A small-molecule modulator of cardiac myosin acts on multiple stages of the myosin chemomechanical cycle. J Biol Chem 2017; 292: 16571-7.
18.
Hartman JJ, Hwee DT, Robert-Paganin J, et al. Aficamten is a small-molecule cardiac myosin inhibitor designed to treat hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Nat Cardiovasc Res 2024; 3: 1003-16.
19.
Marian AJ, Braunwald E. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: genetics, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and therapy. Circ Res 2017; 121: 749-70.
20.
Veselka J, Anavekar NS, Charron P. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy [published correction appears in Lancet 2017; 389: 1194]. Lancet 2017; 389: 1253-67.
21.
Jensen MK, Havndrup O, Pecini R, et al. Comparison of Valsalva maneuver and exercise in echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010; 11: 763-9.
22.
Harris C, Croce B, Munkholm-Larsen S. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 6: 429.
23.
Maron MS, Olivotto I, Betocchi S, et al. Effect of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction on clinical outcome in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 295-303.
24.
Autore C, Bernabò P, Barillà CS, Bruzzi P, Spirito P. The prognostic importance of left ventricular outflow obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy varies in relation to the severity of symptoms. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1076-80.
25.
Elliott PM, Gimeno JR, Tomé MT, et al. Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and sudden death risk in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 1933-41.
26.
Maron BJ, Rowin EJ, Udelson JE, Maron MS. Clinical spectrum and management of heart failure in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. JACC Heart Fail 2018; 6: 353-63.
27.
Maron BJ, Olivotto I, Spirito P, et al. Epidemiology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-related death: revisited in a large non-referral-based patient population. Circulation 2000; 102: 858-64.
28.
Falasconi G, Pannone L, Slavich M, Margonato A, Fragasso G, Spoladore R. Atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Am J Cardiovasc Dis 2020; 10: 409-18.
29.
Hall C. NT-ProBNP: the mechanism behind the marker. J Card Fail 2005; 11 (5 Suppl): S81-3.
30.
Katrukha IA. Human cardiac troponin complex. Structure and functions. Biochemistry. 2013; 78: 1447-65.
31.
Kubo T, Ochi Y, Baba Y, et al. Elevation of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and left ventricular remodelling in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. ESC Heart Fail 2020; 7: 3593-600.
32.
Kubo T, Kitaoka H, Yamanaka S, et al. Significance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 1252-9.
33.
Hutt E, Mentias A, Alashi A, et al. Prognostic value of age-sex adjusted NT-proBNP ratio in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2022; 74: 11-8.
34.
Coats CJ, Gallagher MJ, Foley M, et al. Relation between serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and prognosis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 2529-37.
35.
Geske JB, McKie PM, Ommen SR, Sorajja P. B-type natriuretic peptide and survival in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 2456-60.
36.
Chevalier C, Wendner M, Suling A, et al. Association of NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT with imaging markers of diastolic dysfunction and focal myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Life (Basel) 2022; 12: 1241.