CLINICAL RESEARCH
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Chronic venous disease (CVD) constitutes a frequently underdiagnosed pathological condition that progressively diminishes patients’ quality of life and imposes an escalating strain on healthcare resources. This study aims to comprehensively investigate the epidemiological landscape of varicose vein disease, examining age group distributions, gender patterns, residence influences, marital status correlations, weight considerations, educational impacts, and various aspects related to varicose veins.

Material and methods:
This was a single-centre retrospective analysis, in Albania from May 2018 to September 2023. Data were collected retrospectively through hospital records. Data collection involved administering a structured questionnaire to study participants, categorically organised into three sections. The first section focused on collecting demographic information, the second section involved self-perception of identifying risk factors associated with varicose veins, and the final section included inquiries about the history of variceal surgery.

Results:
The CEAP classification distribution in our cohort revealed a predominant presence of C2 (varicose veins) in 53.3% of patients, followed by C3 (oedema) at 29.2%, and C4 (changes in skin and subcutaneous tissue secondary to CVD) at 10.5%, whereas C5 (healed venous ulcer) and C6 (active venous ulcer) were less frequent. Based on the body mass index (BMI) scale, data from patients indicated that 9.7% were in the category of underweight, 54.8% had a normal BMI, and 35.5% were categorised as overweight.

Conclusions:
The study’s thorough exploration of patient perspectives, risk factors, and treatment choices contributes to a holistic understanding of varicose vein management, emphasising the importance of personalised approaches that account for demographic variations and individual beliefs.

 
REFERENCES (29)
1.
Jameson L, Fauci A, Kasper D, et al. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. 20th ed. McGraw-Hill Medical Publ. Division 2018.
 
2.
Eberhardt RT, Raffetto JD. Chronic venous insufficiency. Circulation 2014; 130: 333-46.
 
3.
Santler B, Goerge T. Chronic venous insufficiency – a review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2017; 15: 538-56.
 
4.
Nicolaides AN, Labropoulos N. Burden and suffering in chronic venous disease. Adv Ther 2019; 36 (Suppl 1): 1-4.
 
5.
Beebe-Dimmer JL, Pfeifer JR, Engle JS, Schottenfeld D. The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. Ann Epidemiol 2005; 15: 175-84.
 
6.
Criqui MH, Denenberg JO, Bergan J, et al. Risk factors for chronic venous disease: the San Diego population study. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46: 331-7.
 
7.
Matic M, Matic A, Djuran V, et al. Frequency of peripheral arterial disease in patients with chronic venous insufficiency. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2016; 18: e20781.
 
8.
Zegarra TI, Tadi P. CEAP Classification of Venous Disorders. 2023 Mar 27. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan–. PMID: 32491342.
 
9.
Smith AB, Johnson JM. Venous anatomy. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/b....
 
10.
Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, Dalsing MC, et al. The care of patients with varicose veins and related chronic venous disease: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53(5 Suppl): 2S-48S.
 
11.
Porter JM, Moneta GL. Reporting standards in venous disease: an update. International consensus committee on chronic venous disease. J Vasc Surg 1995; 22: 457-67.
 
12.
Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, Dalsing MC et al.; Society for Vascular Surgery; American Venous Forum. The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53 (5 Suppl): 2S-48S.
 
13.
Partsch H, Mortimer P. Compression for leg wounds. Br J Dermatol 2015; 173: 359-69.
 
14.
Lurie F, De Maeseneer MG. The 2020 Update of the CEAP Classification: what is New? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2020; 59: 859-60.
 
15.
Lurie F, Schwartz M. Patient-centered outcomes of a dual action pneumatic compression device in comparison to compression stockings for patients with chronic venous disease. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2017; 5: 699-706.e1.
 
16.
American College of Phlebology. Treatment of superficial venous disease of the lower leg:practiceguidelines:superficial-venous-disease rev020316. https://tinyurl.com/3m35dkaa.
 
17.
O’Meara S, Cullum N, Nelson EA, Dumville JC. Compression for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 11: CD000265.
 
18.
Raju S, Hollis K, Neglen P. Use of compression stockings in chronic venous disease: patient compliance and efficacy. Ann Vasc Surg 2007; 21: 790-5.
 
19.
Kankam HK, Lim CS, Fiorentino F, et al. A summation analysis of compliance and complications of compression hosiery for patients with chronic venous disease or post-thrombotic syndrome. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018; 55: 406-16.
 
20.
Berti F, Omini C, Longiave D. The mode of action of Aescin and the release of prostaglandins. Prostaglandins 1977; 14: 241-9.
 
21.
Pittler MH, Ernst E. Horse chestnut seed extract for chronic venous insufficiency. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 11: CD003230.
 
22.
Tisi PV, Beverley C, Rees A. Injection sclerotherapy for varicose veins. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 4: CD001732.
 
23.
de-Abreu GC, Camargo Júnior O, de-Abreu MF, de-Aquino JL. Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for severe chronic venous insufficiency. Rev Col Bras Cir 2017; 44: 511-20.
 
24.
Bootun R, Lane TR, Davies AH. A comparison of thermal and non-thermal ablation. Rev Vasc Med 2016; 4-5: 1-8.
 
25.
Paravastu SC, Horne M, Dodd PD. Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical repair for short saphenous varicose veins. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2016: CD010878.
 
26.
Kabnick LS, Sadek M. Fiber type as compared to wavelength may contribute more to improving postoperative recovery following endovenous laser ablation. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2016; 4: 286-92.
 
27.
Menyhei G, Gyevnár Z, Arató E, et al. Conventional stripping versus cryostripping: a prospective randomised trial to compare improvement in quality of life and complications. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 35: 218-23.
 
28.
Disselhoff BC, der Kinderen DJ, Kelder JC, Moll FL. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with cryostripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 1107-11.
 
29.
Masuda E, Ozsvath K, Vossler J, et al. The 2020 appropriate use criteria for chronic lower extremity venous disease of the American Venous Forum, the Society for Vascular Surgery, the American Vein and Lymphatic Society, and the Society of Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2020; 8: 505-25.e4.
 
ISSN:2451-0629
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top